click here for the new...
FIVE BEFORE CHAOS HAS OFFICIALLY MOVED TO A BIGGER AND BETTER PLACE! PLEASE CLICK THE ABOVE BANNER TO GET THERE, AND DON'T FORGET TO BOOKMARK THE NEW LOCATION. THANKS FOR STOPPING BY!

Wednesday, August 9, 2006

Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaahhhh!

Well, we won one. Finally. Feels good, doesn't it? Bush suckass Holy Joe Lieberman lost to Ned Lamont last night in Connecticut. There are so many things to say about this, I don't know where to start. Please bear with me as I weave back and forth between the Lamont thing and a broader strategy for those on the left.

My first thought is that even though Americans as a whole have a pretty wide and nasty anti-intellectual streak, and are slow to pick up on things, eventually they come around. The miracle of CT is that even after listening to years of inside-the-beltway pundit bullshit and horrible corporate news misinformation, the scales are starting to fall from the eyes of America. I wanted to puke last weekend when ABC's Cokie Roberts told us how a Lamont victory would 'be a disaster for the Democratic party.' Joe Lieberman has been a disaster for the Democratic party. His neo-con, DLC ways are EXACTLY why Dems have been getting their asses kicked time after time in elections. It blows my mind how the MSM has made being 'anti-war' some kind of radical notion. Or that most moderate to liberal ideas, such as non-discrimination, intelligent, respectful diplomacy, and universal healthcare are somehow now 'fringe' ideas. The dialogue and the frames need to change.

It's going to be increasingly hard to frame an anti-war position as a fringe 'liberal blogger' position when 60% of the country feels that way. That's quite a large fringe, won't you say? How much longer are we going to hear about 1972 and George McGovern? Man, that shit is sooooo old now, and most young people don't have a clue about that anyways. We need to take command of the dialogue. Now. And that has to include that there is nothing noble or good about being 'pro-war'. Killing large amounts of people indiscriminately is never a good thing, and to somehow be proud of that is even worse.

How much longer are the Repugs going to keep whining about 'cut and run'? Next time you hear that, this is what needs to be said:

"Right now, our troops are in the midst of a bloody, sectarian civil war. America, once admired and respected as a leader in the world, is now increasingly disliked and distrusted because of our unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country, something more akin to the old Soviet Union. The Bush rationale for this war, now proven to be unequivocally false, continues to morph and change almost daily. Pulling our troops out of Iraq is not 'cutting and running'. It's common sense, because they should have never been there in the first place. The best way to support our troops is to remove them from harm's way. Staying a failed course is not a viable option, and will only continue to weaken America."

Now, jeez, was that so hard? And damn it, stop letting them use that 'war on terror' frame, too. Remind people you can't have war on a tactic. It's not like fighting the Nazis. For every one you kill, five more will be there to take their place. And then point out that the ineptitude of the Bushies has continually ignored that fact. Get Bin Laden, and then work on addressing the causes of terrorism (not being held captive to AIPAC and the Israel lobby would be a great start, howzabout a little bit of balance here?).

I know, it seems like I'm borderline ranting here, and I'm trying to make this more cohesive, it's just that like many in the left blogosphere, I have a lot of emotional and intellectual capital invested in what has happened in Connecticut.

It's interesting how the punditry was framing a Lamont victory as a 'disaster.' Also interesting is the amount of knuckledraggers on the far right who wholeheartedly endorsed Lieberman. It reads like a who's who of contemporary neo-con fascism: Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Michelle Malkin, Bill Kristol, and of course, George W. himself. And I hope that, when running against the now-independent Joe, that the Lamont people remind the CT voters of that fact; show the statements made by those people, show the Bush kiss, and show how Joe was the FIRST senator to stand and applaud Bush's talk about Iraq at last year's State of the Union. Show it over. And over. And over.

And when talking about our new progressive visions for America, we need to stress how THEY are the radicals, not us. It was refreshing to hear Lamont speak of 'the common good' in his acceptance speech. A few months ago, when Donny Osman, the Vermont State Senate candidate whose campaign I'm helping to run, mentioned that at his kickoff speech, the common good was referred to and went over very well with the audience. So we need to hammer these themes home, time after time. Most of the good things that have happened in this country happened because of liberal ideas, not conservative ones. Conservatism by definition goes against human nature, which is in a constant state of change, almost always toward a more equal egalitarian society.

I'm cautiously excited. The last 6 years have been very hard for forward-thinking people in this country. The pendulum, has been swinging to the right since 1968. It could very well be swinging back now. Time to relentlessly open that can of whupass on the right and thier morally and intellectually bankrupt ways of thinking.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why, why, why, does that Shrub-loving, media-whoring shill, Cokie Roberts, continue to have a job? Surely there is no one left in America that doesn't understand her for exactly what she is?

krmudgeon said...

Very well said. The voters in Connecticut have a choice this fall between two Republicans and one true Democrat.

Let's hope that the Republican main stream media echo chamber doesn't convince voters that a vote for the "liberal" values of peace, sanity and economic wellbeing for all is a "wasted" vote.

http://crumbs-from-the-curmudgeon.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

Yes. well, you know the word "apocolypse" means "the lifting of the veil"

Anonymous said...

Curmudgeon...
I've thought a lot about the echo chamber problem, especially the day after the primary, and how a good majority of the MSM articles on CNN and MSNBC either cast some sort of doubt, made it seem like the victory will hurt Democrats, and at some points, asically echoing Repug talking points. I really don't think the shit will stick to the wall much longer. How are they going to continue to frame the majority of Americans as the fringe and not get a serious backlash?

krmudgeon said...

I fear that the main stream media will, indeed, pick up on this "defeatocrat" theme that the Republicans ar throwing out there. The reason they will do so is because so many main stream media journalists - like so many wimpy Democratic legislators - are more concerned about maintaining their privilege within the status quo than with speaking truth. Somebody like Cokie Roberts, for instance, speaks from years of knowledge and experience. But there are two problems with that. 1.) She is working from a pre-GWBush paradigmatic perspective. 2.) She is part of the D.C. elite who attend parties and events with the very people she should be covering. She has cozied up the the "popular kids" in D.C. and doesn't want to be outgrouped because she dares to say something truly critical. I once heard her husband praise George Bush as "a lot smarter than people give him credit for." I knew right then that he and Cokie had sold their souls to maintain their access to power -- and that they were full of shit.

The same thing will drive the echo chamber. Because all the "popular pundits" will be repeating the "defeatocrat" frame, the media will be repeating it as well. Journalists, far from being courageous independent thinkers, are slow moving herd animals. They always take a long time to catch up to the true zeitgeist of the people.

Anonymous said...

Of course they're going to pick up on it. The big difference this time is like I said, that shit won't stick anymore, any more than crying '9-11' every other minute does. Just wait and see. The credibilty of the MSM is really taking a blow with this. Not only that, I think some people out there are going to be insulted by having their deeply held views pegged as 'the extreme left'(not me though). I really think this is going to be different. Maybe I'm just tired of losing battle after battle. It felt good to win one.

Anonymous said...

About the American MSM. I just returned from a couple of weeks visiting Florida. As a European, I was just incredulous at the superficiality and unrelenting bias of CNN and the other TV channels. The Israeli destruction of Lebanon was reported as some kind of benign self defence scheme. There was hardly a coherent analysis to be seen. In 2 weeks of TV, I heard precisely one mention of Global Warming, and that was a throwaway item by Keith Olberman. On the other hand, CNN was widely advertising a special on whether the Lebanon invasion was a sign of 'Armageddon': talk about anti-scientific regression! On returning home, I switched on BBC News 24. Within half an hour I honestly received more actual news than in 2 weeks in the US. This is, sadly, a straight-up fact. US TV is an intensely hypnotic cartoon-like propaganda version of reality.It is not just infotainment - its a perfectly crafted,seamless, complete distortion. Unless progressives can counter it with a genuine news channel distributed throughout the States, its quite hard to see how to avert the decline and fall of your once great country in a peak oil-global warming flame-out. And while I'm at it, why do these redneck fossil fuel corporations like ExxonMobil continue to get away with their blatant distortion of the options? Hasnt anyone over there heard of that wonderful possibility called economic boycott? That would be one surefire way to get the attention of the Republicans - selectively boycott their corporate masters. George Bush is just the condom with which the fossil fuel industry entered the US government.

Anonymous said...

Every Democrat that had made a campaign contribution to Joe Lieberman should demand their contributions be returned since Joe is no longer a Democrat.
If we do not demand that OUR contributions be returned it will be OUR own money being used against us. We cannot allow our campaign contributions to Lieberman to be used against us!
DEMAND A REFUND!!!

Anonymous said...

Right on point- this is huge- progressive, sane, reasonable LOGICAL, compassionate politics is coming back! Be afraid, ye republican fools...

Anonymous said...

Horus, please tell me that you didn't give Lieberman any money....;)

To my European friend, yes, in a nutshell, American TV news is a joke, albeit a pretty sick one. As far as economic boycotts are concerned, that would require an informed and principled citizenry, something that is unfortunately a minority in the U.S. Thanks for stopping in.

Anonymous said...

"Common good"? "A more egalitarian society"? Excellent rhetorical flourishes borrowed from Stalin. Why not refer to the current, perceived surge with Lieberman's loss as a proxy as a "great leap forward"? I am sure that will play well with your base as well.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous troll... now, you being a rightie and such, I'm sure your critical capacities are somewhat stunted, but how about trying to take those phrases that got your panties in a bunch and just look at them for what they mean... common good.. a system that benefits all, not just some... egalitarian society a more equal, fair, and just society. Nothing Stalinistic about those definitions, even though, yes, they were also used in Soviet propaganda. Kind of funny with you referring to Stalin, since your boy is much more like him than anyone on our side is. Red baiting is soooo 1950's. Get over it.